VA’s Denial of IVF Benefits to Veterans in Same-Sex Marriages (Sheffield v. Dept. ofVeterans Affairs)

On August 2, 2023, Air Force Veteran Ashley Sheffield filed a class action lawsuit against the Department of Veterans Affairs and VA Secretary Denis McDonough alleging that her constitutional rights—and those of other veterans—were violated because the VA’s health system provides IVF benefits to veterans in opposite-sex marriages but prohibits veterans in same-sex marriages from receiving the same IVF benefits.

Ms. Sheffield served for nearly 20 years in the Air Force before her military retirement. Because of injuries from her service, Ms. Sheffield has developed conditions that affect her fertility. She sought IVF services from the VA, but the agency told her that she did not qualify for IVF benefits because she is married to a woman.

In the complaint, Ms. Sheffield alleges that the VA’s sex and sexual orientation discrimination against veterans in same-sex marriages violates the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection and due process and also violates a federal law that prohibits federal health programs from discriminating based on sex. More than 10 years ago the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional the Defense of Marriage Act, which defined marriage to exclude same-sex marriages. And in 2022 President Biden signed the Respect for Marriage Act, which formally repeated DOMA. Nevertheless, in 2023 the VA is still applying DOMA’s unconstitutional definition of marriage to deny IVF benefits to veterans who are in same-sex marriages.

Ms. Sheffield and proposed class are represented by PRF Law, the National Veterans Legal Services Program, and Brody, Hardoon, Perkins & Kesten, LLP.

The case is known as Ashley Sheffield v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al., No. 23 Civ. 11757 (D. Mass.), and is pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

Case Documents

Media

Previous
Previous

TikTok’s Retaliation Against Workers Who Complain of Racial Discrimination (Matima & Carter v. ByteDance/TikTok)

Next
Next

Amazon & Starbucks Biometric Surveillance Litigation (Mallouk v. Amazon & Starbucks)